homeU.S.

US Supreme Court declines to hear appeal of Christian school that was banned from relocating to Michigan township

(YouTube/First Liberty)The logo of Livingston Christian Schools appears in a screen capture of a video from First Liberty.

The U.S. Supreme Court has announced on Monday that it will not consider the appeal of Livingston Christian School (LCS), which was prevented from relocating to a Michigan Township after the board refused to grant a permit in 2015.

The Genoa Township rejected the school's request to use a part of Brighton Church of the Nazarene in 2015 citing traffic concerns.

According to Livingston Daily, the school wanted to move from its old location in neighboring Pinckney before the start of the 2015–2016 school year and had entered into a lease agreement with the church.

Court documents have indicated that the school moved out of Pinckney because of enrollment and income concerns.

The rejection has prompted LCS to sue the Township under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.

Under the legislation, cities are prohibited from using zoning rules to drive out religious institutions from their jurisdiction.

The First Liberty Institute, which represented the school in court, argued that the school's request was denied despite recommendations from the town's planning commission and consultants, who reportedly gave their approval to use the property for the school.

The lawsuit further contended that the township's rejection substantially burdened the school's operations.

A federal court ruled in favor of the township, prompting LCS to file an appeal. In June last year, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the township did not violate federal religious protection laws when it rejected the school's application.

The appellate court stated that the school had failed to present sufficient evidence that the location in Pinckney was not sufficient for its operations.

Hiram Sasser, general counsel at First Liberty, expressed concern that the Sixth Circuit and the Supreme Court decision could set a precedent for other towns and cities to reject other religious schools.

"This is a deeply disappointing decision, not only because of what it means for our clients but because it will embolden other cities and towns across the country to keep religious organizations from contributing to their community," he said in a statement, according to CBN News.

"Federal law expressly prohibits the government from using zoning laws to keep religious institutions out of their town. We are extremely disappointed the Supreme Court will allow this terrible precedent to stand. We are, however, grateful to Rob Kelner and the entire team at Covington & Burling, LLP, for their diligent efforts in seeking to protect religious freedom in this case," he continued.

Go to the Home Page

Top News

Inside Christian Times