Trump's religious liberty executive order gets mixed reviews from conservatives

U.S. President Donald Trump prepares to sign the Executive Order on Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty during the National Day of Prayer event at the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington D.C., U.S., May 4, 2017. | Reuters/Carlos Barria

President Donald Trump signed a highly anticipated executive order on religious liberty in front of faith leaders at the White House Rose Garden on the National Day of Prayer on Thursday. Some conservative leaders considered the move as a step in the right direction, but others say it does not go far enough to protect religious freedom.

According to a summary released by the White House on Wednesday, the order addresses three areas of concern.

The first provision attempts to fulfill Trump's campaign promise to repeal the Johnson Amendment, which prohibits tax-exempt organizations from endorsing political candidates. It calls on the IRS to avoid taking adverse action against religious organizations on the basis of speech that can be considered political.

Another section of the order provides "regulatory relief" for religious organizations that have objections to the Obamacare mandate, which requires employers to pay for contraceptives and abortifacient drugs in their healthcare plans.

The third section gives "religious liberty guidance" to all agencies, notifying them about the conscience protections provided under federal law, according to World.

The order was praised by Focus on the Family founder James Dobson, who said that Trump's action "must be the first among others because the efforts by previous administrations to marginalize conservative communities of faith were real, thorough and complex."

Family Research Council president Tony Perkins said that the religious liberty order is the start of a process in reversing the "devastating trend set by the last administration to punish charities, pastors, family owned businesses and honest, hard-working people simply for living according to their faith."

But Gregory Baylor, an attorney with Alliance Defending Freedom, said that the order still leaves Trump's campaign promises on religious liberty unfulfilled.

He said that it was "disappointingly vague, especially given the long existence of an obvious means of solving the problem: crafting an exemption that protects all those who sincerely object on religious and moral grounds so that they can continue to serve their communities and the most vulnerable among them."

Ryan Anderson, a senior fellow at the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation, said that the language of the executive order was too soft and that it "fails to address most pressing religious liberty threats."

Johnnie Moore, a member of Trump's evangelical advisory board who was at the signing ceremony, said that Christian conservatives are being "unrealistic" for thinking that Trump can solve all religious liberty issues in one executive order.

He argued that the Obama administration was so thorough in "dismantling" religious liberty that it would be impossible to fix in one sweeping action.

The American Civil Liberties Union has already vowed to file a lawsuit against the order even before the White House published the final language of the order, according to The Christian Post. Other liberal and pro-LGBT groups have also expressed their intentions to take legal action against the order earlier this week.